Read Ebook: The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita by Unknown Gemmell William Translator Kumarajiva Translator

Font size: 10 px 15 px 20 px 25 px 30 px 35 px

Background color: BlackWhiteGrayLight GrayDark GrayDim Gray

Text color: BlackWhiteGrayLight GrayDark GrayDim Gray

Apply/Save settings

Ebook has 499 lines and 34422 words, and 10 pages

Some modern Japanese Buddhists appear to regard this purely spiritual element as "essence of mind."

Compare p. 110.

Compare pp. 102, 103.

Bodhisattvas--greatly enlightened disciples.

Fah-Shen--the Law, or spiritual body. Compare Shen-Shen, the term usually employed in the Chinese rendering of the New Testament Scriptures to denote the spiritual body.

Gatha--usually a Scripture verse comprising four lines.

"I am not known To evil-doers, ... nor to those Whose mind is cheated by the show of things."

In Buddhist phraseology, Yuen-Chioh means the study, by means of contemplation, of primary spiritual causes.

"Thou, of all souls the Soul! The comprehending whole!"

In colloquial Chinese there is a noteworthy saying, that "Buddha is simply a condition of mind." This "condition of mind" is beautifully expressed by a "classic" couplet, which, rendered into English, means "as pure as the image of the moon in a river," and "as lovely as the bloom of a flower in a mirror" .

Compare the beautifully expressed sentiment of Akhnaton, Pharaoh of Egypt, concerning "the One in whom all Laws are intelligibly comprehended." "There is no poverty for him who hath Thee in his heart."

THE DIAMOND SUTRA

Thus have I heard concerning our Lord Buddha:--

Upon a memorable occasion, the Lord Buddha sojourned in the kingdom of Shravasti, lodging in the grove of Jeta, a park within the imperial domain, which Jeta, the heir-apparent, bestowed upon Sutana, a benevolent Minister of State, renowned for his charities and benefactions.

With the Lord Buddha, there were assembled together twelve hundred and fifty mendicant disciples, all of whom had attained to eminent degrees of spiritual wisdom.

As it approached the hour for the morning meal, Lord Buddha, Honoured of the Worlds, attired himself in a mendicant's robe, and bearing an alms-bowl in his hands, walked towards the great city of Shravasti, which he entered to beg for food. Within the city he proceeded from door to door, and received such donations as the good people severally bestowed. Concluding this religious exercise, the Lord Buddha returned to the grove of Jeta, and partook of the frugal meal received as alms. Thereafter he divested himself of his mendicant's robe, laid aside the venerated alms-bowl, bathed his sacred feet, and accepted the honoured seat reserved for him by his disciples.

It is generally supposed that the familiar introductory phrase, "Thus have I heard," was adopted by the writers or editors of Buddhist Sutras in order that their scriptures might assume the same high degree of authority as the Brahmanas and the Mantras, "as forming the 'S'ruti' or sacred revelation of the followers of the Vedas."

A title conferred by Chinese Buddhists upon the founder of their faith, believing him to be a Teacher and Saviour whose merit is acclaimed in worlds beyond our own.

Having taken vows of poverty, a robe is one of the following eight articles which Buddhist monks are permitted to possess: three garments of different descriptions, a girdle for the loins, an alms-bowl, a razor, a needle, and a water-strainer.

Upon that occasion, the venerable Subhuti occupied a place in the midst of the assembly. Rising from his seat, with cloak arranged in such manner that his right shoulder was disclosed, Subhuti knelt upon his right knee, then pressing together the palms of his hands, he respectfully raised them towards Lord Buddha, saying: "Thou art of transcendent wisdom, Honoured of the Worlds! With wonderful solicitude, Thou dost preserve in the faith, and instruct in the Law, this illustrious assembly of enlightened disciples. Honoured of the Worlds! if a good disciple, whether man or woman, seeks to obtain supreme spiritual wisdom, what immutable Law shall sustain the mind of that disciple, and bring into subjection every inordinate desire?"

The Lord Buddha replied to Subhuti, saying: "Truly a most excellent theme! As you affirmed, I preserve in the faith, and instruct in the Law, this illustrious assembly of enlightened disciples. Attend diligently unto me, and I shall enunciate a Law whereby the mind of a good disciple, whether man or woman, seeking to obtain supreme spiritual wisdom, shall be adequately sustained, and enabled to bring into subjection every inordinate desire." Subhuti was gratified, and signified glad consent. Thereupon, the Lord Buddha, with majesty of person, and perfect articulation, proceeded to deliver the text of this Scripture, saying:--

"Bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ."--The Apostle Paul.

"Moreover, Subhuti, an enlightened disciple ought to act spontaneously in the exercise of charity, uninfluenced by sensuous phenomena such as sound, odour, taste, touch, or Law. Subhuti, it is imperative that an enlightened disciple, in the exercise of charity, should act independently of phenomena. And why? Because, acting without regard to illusive forms of phenomena, he will realise in the exercise of charity, a merit inestimable and immeasurable."

"Subhuti, what think you? Is it possible to estimate the distance comprising the illimitable universe of space?" Subhuti replied, saying: "Honoured of the Worlds! It is impossible to estimate the distance comprising the illimitable universe of space." The Lord Buddha thereupon discoursed, saying: "It is equally impossible to estimate the merit of an enlightened disciple, who discharges the exercise of charity, unperturbed by the seductive influences of phenomena. Subhuti, the mind of an enlightened disciple ought thus to be indoctrinated."

The Lord Buddha interrogated Subhuti, saying: "What think you? Is it possible that by means of his physical body, the Lord Buddha may be clearly perceived?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! It is impossible that by means of his physical body, the Lord Buddha may be clearly perceived. And why? Because, what the Lord Buddha referred to as a physical body, is in reality not merely a physical body." Thereupon the Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "Every form or quality of phenomena is transient and illusive. When the mind realises that the phenomena of life are not real phenomena, the Lord Buddha may then be clearly perceived."

Subhuti enquired of the Lord Buddha, saying: "Honoured of the Worlds! In future ages, when this scripture is proclaimed, amongst those beings destined to hear, shall any conceive within their minds a sincere, unmingled faith?"

The Lord Buddha replied to Subhuti, saying: "Have no such apprehensive thought! Even at the remote period of five centuries subsequent to the Nirvana of the Lord Buddha, there will be many disciples observing the monastic vows, and assiduously devoted to good works. These, hearing this scripture proclaimed, will believe in its immutability, and similarly conceive within their minds a pure, unmingled faith. Besides, it is important to realise that faith thus conceived, is not exclusively in virtue of the insular thought of any particular Buddha, but because of its affiliation with the concrete thoughts of myriad Buddhas, throughout infinite ages. Therefore, amongst the beings destined to hear this Scripture proclaimed, many, by momentary reflection, will intuitively conceive a pure and holy faith."

"Subhuti, the Lord Buddha by his prescience, is perfectly cognisant of all such potential disciples, and for these also there is reserved an immeasurable merit. And why? Because, the minds of these disciples will not revert to such arbitrary concepts of phenomena as an entity, a being, a living being, a personality, qualities or ideas coincident with Law, or existing apart from the idea of Law. And why? Because, assuming the permanency and reality of phenomena, the minds of these disciples would be involved in such distinctive ideas as an entity, a being, a living being, and a personality. Affirming the permanency and reality of qualities or ideas coincident with Law, their minds would inevitably be involved in resolving these same definitions. Postulating the inviolate nature of qualities or ideas which have an existence apart from the Law, there yet remain to be explained these abstruse distinctions--an entity, a being, a living being, and a personality. Therefore, enlightened disciples ought not to affirm the permanency or reality of qualities or ideas coincident with Law, nor postulate as being of an inviolate nature, qualities or ideas having an existence apart from the concept of Law."

"Thus, we are enabled to appreciate the significance of those words which the Lord Buddha invariably repeated to his followers: 'You disciples must realise that the Law which I enunciated, was presented before your minds in the simile of a raft. If the Law--having fulfilled its function in bearing you to the other shore --with its coincident qualities and ideas must inevitably be abandoned, how much more inevitable must be the abandonment of qualities or ideas which have an existence apart from the Law?'"

Compare the question addressed by Jesus to His disciples, "When the Son of Man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?"

When a novice seeks admission to a monastic order, an ordination service is conducted by a chapter of monks, at which the following vows are administered. "I take the vow not to destroy life. I take the vow not to steal. I take the vow to abstain from impurity. I take the vow not to lie. I take the vow to abstain from intoxicating drinks, which hinder progress and virtue. I take the vow not to eat at forbidden times. I take the vow to abstain from dancing, singing, music, and stage plays. I take the vow not to use garlands, scents, unguents, or ornaments. I take the vow not to use a high or broad bed. I take the vow not to receive gold or silver."

Compare an idea expressed by the apostle Paul, "wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ." Note, also, the similarity of a metaphor employed in Christian anthology, "We shall meet on that beautiful 'shore.'"

"Our little systems have their day, They have their day and cease to be; They are but broken lights of Thee, But thou, O Lord, art more than they."--Tennyson.

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "What think you? Has the Lord Buddha really attained to supreme spiritual wisdom? Or has he a system of doctrine which can be specifically formulated?"

Subhuti replied, saying: "As I understand the meaning of the Lord Buddha's discourse, he has no system of doctrine which can be specifically formulated; nor can the Lord Buddha express, in explicit terms, a form of knowledge which can be described as supreme spiritual wisdom. And why? Because, what the Lord Buddha adumbrated in terms of the Law, is transcendental and inexpressible. Being a purely spiritual concept, it is neither consonant with Law, nor synonymous with anything apart from the Law. Thus is exemplified the manner by which wise disciples and holy Buddhas, regarding intuition as the Law of their minds, severally attained to different planes of spiritual wisdom."

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "What think you? If a benevolent person bestowed as alms, an abundance of the seven treasures sufficient to fill the universe, would there accrue to that person a considerable merit?"

Subhuti replied, saying: "A very considerable merit, Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, what is referred to does not partake of the nature of ordinary merit, and in this sense the Lord Buddha made mention of a 'considerable' merit."

The Lord Buddha rejoined, saying: "If a disciple adhered with implicit faith to a stanza of this Scripture, and diligently explained it to others, the intrinsic merit of that disciple would be relatively greater. And why? Because, Subhuti, the holy Buddhas, and the Law by which they attained to supreme spiritual wisdom, severally owe their inception to the truth of this sacred Scripture. Subhuti, what is ordinarily termed the Buddhic Law, is not really a Law attributive to Buddha."

Gold, silver, pearls, coral, cornelian, glass, and crystal.

The Lord Buddha enquired of Subhuti, saying: "What think you? May a Scrotapatti thus moralise within himself, 'I have obtained the fruits commensurate with the merit of a Scrotapatti'?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, Scrotapatti is simply a descriptive term signifying 'having entered the stream.' A disciple who avoids the seductive phenomena of form, sound, odour, taste, touch, and Law, is named a Scrotapatti."

The Lord Buddha again enquired of Subhuti, saying: "What think you? May a Sakridagami thus muse within himself, 'I have obtained the fruits consonant with the merit of a Sakridagami'?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, Sakridagami is merely a descriptive title denoting 'only one more reincarnation'; but in reality there is no such condition as 'only one more reincarnation,' hence Sakridagami is merely a descriptive title."

The Lord Buddha once again enquired of Subhuti, saying: "What think you? May an Anagami thus reflect within himself, 'I have obtained the fruits which accord with the merit of an Anagami?'" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, Anagami is merely a designation meaning 'immunity from reincarnation'; but in reality there is no such condition as 'immunity from reincarnation,' hence Anagami is merely a convenient designation."

The Lord Buddha yet again enquired of Subhuti, saying: "What think you? May an Arhat thus meditate within himself, 'I have obtained the condition of an Arhat'?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, there is not in reality a condition synonymous with the term Arhat. Honoured of the Worlds! if an Arhat thus meditates within himself, 'I have obtained the condition of an Arhat,' there would be obvious recurrence of such arbitrary concepts as an entity, a being, a living being, and a personality. Honoured of the Worlds! When the Lord Buddha declared that in absolute quiescence of mind, perfect observance of the Law, and true spiritual perception, I was pre-eminent amongst the disciples, I did not cogitate thus within myself, 'I am an Arhat, freed from desire!' Had I thus cogitated, 'I have obtained the condition of an Arhat,' the 'Honoured of the Worlds' would not have declared concerning me, 'Subhuti delights in the austerities practised by the Aranyaka'; but, in reality, Subhuti was perfectly quiescent and oblivious to phenomena; hence the allusion, 'Subhuti delights in the austerities practised by the Aranyaka.'"

In the moral philosophy of Mencius there is inculcated a principle of having few desires , and Chinese Buddhists frequently institute comparisons between those "few desires" and "no desires" of the Arhats.

A Chinese annotator suggests it is almost self-evident that "absolute quiescence" is the condition of mind in which knowledge is acquired by intuition.

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "What think you? When the Lord Buddha, in a previous life, was a disciple of Dipankara Buddha, was there communicated to him any prescribed Law, or system of doctrine, whereby he eventually became a Buddha?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! When the Lord Buddha was a disciple of Dipankara Buddha, neither prescribed Law nor system of doctrine was communicated to him, whereby he eventually became a Buddha."

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "What think you? may an enlightened disciple thus ponder within himself, 'I shall create numerous Buddhist Kingdoms'?" Subhuti replied, saying: "No! Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, kingdoms thus created would not in reality be Buddhist kingdoms, therefore 'the creation of numerous Buddhist kingdoms' is merely a figure of speech."

The Lord Buddha, continuing, addressed Subhuti, saying: "Enlightened disciples ought therefore to engender within themselves a pure and holy mind; they ought not to depend on the phenomena of form, sound, odour, taste, touch, or Law; they ought to sedulously cultivate a mind independent of every material aid."

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "Supposing a man with a body as pretentious as Sumeru, prince among mountains, would you esteem such a body as being great?" Subhuti replied, saying: "Exceedingly great, Honoured of the Worlds! And why? Because, the Lord Buddha referred not to a physical body, but to mental and spiritual concepts of bodies, in which sense a body may be regarded as really Great."

"The modification which Buddhism introduced into the idea of transmigration was necessitated by the early Buddhist theories of the nature of sentient beings; according to which, man consists of an assemblage of different properties or qualities ... these are Material qualities, Sensations, abstract Ideas, Tendencies of mind, and mental Powers.... The first group, Material Qualities, are like a mass of foam, that gradually forms, and then vanishes. The second group, the Sensations, are like a bubble dancing on the face of the water. The third group, the Ideas, are like the uncertain mirage that appears in the sunshine. The fourth group, the mental and moral Predispositions, are like the plantain stalk, without firmness or solidity. And the last group, the Thoughts, are like a spectre or magical illusion. The body itself is constantly changing, ... man is never the same for two consecutive moments." , revered by gods and men."

The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: "What think you? Did the Lord Buddha formulate a precise system of Law or doctrine?" Subhuti replied, saying: "Honoured of the Worlds! The Lord Buddha did not formulate a precise system of Law or doctrine."

Share on: WhatsApp @Hash Facebook Tweet